Get oriented.
Find the instructions, map the code, and understand where a change belongs.
INSTRUCTIONS + NAVIGATIONSee your codebase through an agent’s eyes.
Find the friction. Make the next run better.
EARLY PREVIEW Live tests currently inspect the repository. Grading is next.
The test is designed to investigate how well an agent can understand, navigate, and work in your repository. The evidence matters more than the presence of a file.
Find the instructions, map the code, and understand where a change belongs.
INSTRUCTIONS + NAVIGATIONCheck documented commands. Investigate stale paths, conflicting guidance, and dead ends.
BUILD + INVESTIGATIONA score, a visible journey, and specific suggestions that give you somewhere to start.
REPORT + SUGGESTIONSWe’re building toward this full test. Today’s live scan validates the repo, inventories its files, and records the commit. Explore the full report design →
The planned grade measures the friction an agent encounters: whether instructions agree, documented commands work, and the code is easy to navigate. Only a completed investigation receives a grade. The current inventory scan does not issue a score.
No. A scan checks out the public repository and inspects it in a separate workspace. The current test runs no code from your repository and makes no changes to GitHub.
Completed, graded investigations. The latest completed scan replaces the previous entry for that repository. Inventory scans and partial reports are not ranked. Example entries are labeled and kept in a separate preview.
Select a step to see its evidence. The graph shows the path; the report explains what to improve.
Specific evidence. A clear next step.
Repositories ranked by how well an agent can work in them.
Better instructions. Clearer paths. Fewer dead ends.
| Rank | Repository | Ecosystem | Grade | Scanned | Report |
|---|
One entry per repository. Latest completed investigation. Grades run from A (90–100) to F (below 45).